To ensure this evaluation goes smoothly, please respect the
following set of rules :
- Please remain courteous, polite, respectful and constructive at
all times during this exchange. The trust bond between the
school's community and yourself depends on it.
- Should you notice any malfunctions within the submitted project,
make sure you take the time to discuss those with the student (or
group of students) being graded.
- Keep in mind that some subjects can be interpreted differently. If
you come accross a situation where the student you're grading has
interpreted the subject differently than you, try and judge fairly
whether their interpretation is acceptable or not, and grade them
accordingly. Our peer-evaluation system can only work if you both
take it seriously.
- You may only evaluate whatever is in the GiT submission directory
of the student you are grading.
- Make sure to check wether the GiT submission directory belongs to
the student (or group) you're grading, and that it's the right
project.
- Make sure no mischievous aliases have been used to trick you into
correcting something that is not actually in the official
submitted directory.
- Any script created to make this evaluation session easier -
whether it was produced by you or the student being graded - must
be checked rigorously in order to avoid bad surprises.
- If the student who is grading this project hasn't done the project
him/herself yet, he/she must read the whole topic before starting
the evaluation session.
- Use the flags available to you on this scale in order to report a
submission directory that is empty, non-functional, that contains
a norm errors or a case of cheating, etc... In this case, the
evaluation session ends and the final grade is 0 (or -42, in case
of cheating). However, unless the student has cheated, we advise
you to go through the project together in order for the two (or
more) of you to identify the problems that may have led for this
project to fail, and avoid repeating those mistakes for future
projects.